Sanyo VPCHD700S Compare, Reviews, Discounts

Friday, November 20th, 2009 at 1:13 am

Product: Sanyo VPCHD700S

List Price: $699.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see low price@

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

I feel the same about this product as the previous reviewer.

I was so angry about this camcorder. I had been looking at the other Xacti models and was about to grasp the waterproof Xacti when I found out that this HD version was coming out in a few days. I ordered it immediately.

When it arrived I was very impressed with the size and feel. It is so shrimp and compact, yet is very easy to have and operate. Powerful easier than my stout sony camcorder. It is a sparkling share of technology. The cover is substantial and easy to thought, the controls and buttons are well placed, and the overall make seems to be of high quality.

The first thing I did not like about the camcorder was how narrow the field of concept was. Even when at the widest angle, most zoomed abet place I felt very "zoomed-in" on the subject. I found myself having to pace farther and farther benefit to win all of the action in the video. This was frustrating, but I would forgive this disclose if the images looked sterling.

I took several videos and tranquil photos in various conditions - inside, outside, shining, dim, etc. - and then looked at the results. I was very disappointed in the quality of the videos. The stills were passable (although not nearly as righteous as from my Canon G9), but the videos were grainy, often out of focus, and overall of abominable quality. For this brand I expected more, especially of an HD camcorder.

I am returning the Xaxti today, and will either take a different, less expensive Xacti or will simply consume the video catch of my Canon G9. If you seize this, I highly suggest you do some tests in the first few days - and place all of the packaging materials unprejudiced in case!

I decided to give the camera 2 stars due to the fabulous size, attractive fabricate and ergonomics.

On a side trace, why is it that people collect definite reviews so great more excellent than negative reviews? This is a trend I have seen throughout Amazon.com. It seems like people only want to read genuine things about items they are keen in, but I judge it's distinguished more notable to hear from people who did not like the item - especially if they did a thorough test of the product and seem knowledgeable. Any ideas about this?

Prior reviewers had mentioned the field of plan being too narrow, but I bought the HD700 anyway, thinking that the reviews were subjective and my mileage may vary.

I was optimistic that maybe the HD700 had been slammed by videophiles, and that it would be more than profitable enough for my needs, which largely involve taking family videos.

Out of the box, I recorded a few videos of my three year mature bouncing around on the sofa. With the light of 3 sixty-watt bulbs 10 feet above the sofa, the video was grainy. I tried both the SHQ and the HQ modes for 720p, both were grainy. I tried the same modes with image stabilization turned off, both SHQ and HQ were unprejudiced as grainy. Biggest thing I noticed was how far away from the sofa I had to stand in order to remove the entire sofa (which shouldn't be too hard, since this is a 16:9 widescreen camcorder, moral)?

Next, I did a diminutive experiment. I plot the HD700 up on a tripod a mountainous distance from a wall, and measured the size of the camera's field of idea at widest zoom. To do this, I stuck removeable labels on the wall, staking out the corners of the camera's image, and marked a center dot. The camera and center dot (on the wall) were the same height above the floor. The camera lens was 152 inches from the wall; at this distance, the rectangular field of idea was 67.5 inches high and 119.5 inches wide. Trig-savvy readers can verify that the field of thought is 25 by 43 degrees, with a solid angle of 1075 square degrees (0.327 steradians) . A theoretically perfect fish-eye lens would plan a chubby hemisphere, or 6.28 steradians. We do not inquire the Xacti HD700 to peek like a fish-eye lens, but it does only observe 1/19th of a hemisphere. That's glorious narrow.

I bear this would be a huge videocamera if you are shooting slight things far away from you, and in vivid light. For example, birdwatching on a sunny day. But, if you want to shoot something enormous, like a 40-foot bus, you will need to stand at least 50 feet away! My next phone call is for an RMA number so I can send the HD700 wait on. Sorry, Sanyo, I wanted it to work, I really did. Maybe I will try the HD1000.

By the intention, the HD700's shoe uses a full-size HDMI connector. If you are buying an HDMI cable to sight your HD700 on your HDTV, catch an HDMI cable with normal-sized ends. There is no procedure to hook up the HDMI cable directly to the camera itself, the HDMI cable is connected via the shoe only.

First, a major plight with a lot of reviews is that people with unknown skills lift things with unreasonable expectations and post authoritative sounding reviews. Most don't seem to even discover at the manuals, they unprejudiced try using the equipment at their believe intuitive level and then post awful reviews and catch advantage of the return policy. I have a profitable friend that does this.

The people that read the manuals and actually learn to exhaust things and are too busy enjoying them to bother coming abet to post. So, we leer abominable reviews and consider that some really frosty things are junk.

Personally, I'm no novice. I enjoy three video cameras and a number of digital peaceful cameras that I know and exhaust well, yet I am constantly missing reliable to even vast shots/videos as I don't have a camera with me. I tried, but unbiased got tired of "lugging" them around unless I had a specific purpose in mind. What I wanted was a pocket camera that I'd have with me whether I planned to shoot or not.

I wasn't distinct what I wanted so I stared with pocket smooth cameras that also shot video and, after playing with a few, decided I'd be happier with a pocket video that shot stills. I did a lot of research online looking at web sites with valid serene and video samples. Saw some very nice stuff from a Sanyo CG65, CA65 the HD700. The HD700 seemed to suit my needs so I looked at Sanyo's web region and read all the specs, etc. Sanyo seems to have several web plot, but one Japan based one, (sanyo-dsc dot com -- click on English on the top) has a "Let's shoot more Movies" which shows some things I didn't know the camera could do and even tells you how to do them. Searched some more and found several user reviews of the HD700 with sample videos and stills that convinced me to try the camera so I ordered from Amazon, in brown.

Camera arrived and I immediately loved the feel of it. It slid into my pocket!!! I read the manual while I charged the battery and ran out to play with it in auto mode. Wow! The peaceful pictures were quite inviting, a bit too attractive for me so I space it to Soft which I really like. The video quality was quite nice. I couldn't acquire over the fact that I could objective pull the camera from my pocket and accept that kind of quality! I made a print from one of the smooth pictures and it looked VERY respectable. Showed it to a friend who has since ordered a HD700 (red) for himself and he wasn't even in the market for a unique camera.

I went out the next day and shot all day with it; indoors and outdoors. I shot in a few stores -- garden departments are astronomical for color and close-up tests, at a park, shot some construction workers, etc. The results were worthy better than I expected. The only glitches I had were operator errors, fresh camera, I'm collected at the fumbling stage.

I don't shoot improper light pictures and knew from the beginning this is not a rude light camera, neither are any of my video cameras. Not a jam as I don't tend to shoot in grievous light, but if I did and wanted to consume this camera (or my others) I'd add light, a tripod (there's a tripod mount on the bottom) or both. I did do some fleet grievous light tests by bracing myself against a wall holding the camera with my elbows in and in a two-handed grip, also by setting the camera and my hand on something (shelf, shopping cart, table, etc.) to right things during the longer exposures and the results were nice. I'd recommend a pocketable tabletop type tripod or one of the flexible ones you can also wrap around things to assist secure staunch shots.

I, also, knew that the 38mm share of the 38-190mm (35mm equiv.) lens isn't considered wide, however, it's wider than I'd opinion and works resplendent for me. Found a Phoenix Magnetic Mount 0.45x lens here on Amazon that works WELL with this camera giving you 17mm, now that's wide! Search vimeo dot com for this camera and gawk the test videos.

My suggestions: Step one, download the PDF version of the manual (or exhaust the printed one -- I like PDFs as I can search them) and go through it. Most of the "problems" I've seen posted here and elsewhere are covered in the manual. Step two, check out the Sanyo HD700 tip position. Step three, play and experiment with it. Read up on how to do things (the shortcuts features is really frosty) and win it with you and witness what you and it can do. Step four, search for some Sanyo HD700 related forums and ask questions.

I Treasure this camera and its unique home is in my pockets. Mission accomplished.

Share and Enjoy: