Canon SX120IS Best Price, Reviews, Compare
 |
Canon SX120IS Best Price, Reviews, Compare.
Product: Canon SX120IS Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon SX120IS
I have been debating whether to acquire a point-and-shoot that is ok, or an SLR that is improbable. I couldn't define spending mega$$$ on an SLR because I'm not that sophisticated a photographer. But I have been miserable with point-and-shoots that are so wearisome you miss the describe and that have only a "mini-zoom" feature. But the Canon SX120IS solved it all. First, it's a lot less expensive than an SLR. And with the image stabilizer and a really swiftly shutter response time, I can salvage the action before it's over! It takes stout close-ups, it has 10X optical zoom, and it has lots of other wintry features I can't wait to learn how to spend. Plus the LCD cover is colossal and the controls are easy to spend. My only disappointment is that it has no opinion finder and in some smart light conditions it is hard to sight the mask. But overall, I give it thumbs up!
OK, now that I've archaic it a while, I have more comments. First the good: I could derive it from Amazon and it takes really amazing pictures in difficult lighting conditions, (peruse my uploaded images.) Then the not-so-good: it eats batteries, (which I consider is proper of any camera that uses regular batteries) and the lack of a viewfinder is a bigger distress than I understanding. Now I'm reducing the rating and thinking I should have spent a miniature more and gotten the SX10IS or the newer SX20IS. They have viewfinders, 20X zoom and all the helpful features i like on the SX120IS.
I can't write an in depth review of this camera because I simply don't have the knowledge of either cameras or photography. But I can announce you what I, as a cross amateur, like about it and why I chose it.
I have grandkids. I needed a camera that would allow me to win decent pictures of them - and in a digital format - so that I can, like all pleasant grandparents, brag about my grandkids via email and assign photos to expose that they are the cutest kids on the face of the earth.
I had my "superior" camera - an extinct Pentax K1000 that I've had for about 30 years - and a diminutive, inexpensive digital camera that I got a few years ago and have never been blissful with. Not only was the Pentax not digital, it also turns out that the grandkids can travel noteworthy faster than I can focus. And that camera purchased as my first attempt at digital fair wasn't cutting it. It was overly complicated and with it I wasn't getting pictures excellent enough to piece.
I gave my needs some notion and made the following criteria list:
Easy to consume.
Fast shutter rush.
Easy to spend.
Small enough to fit into my purse easily.
Easy to expend.
My needs were simple and I didn't assume it would be too hard to accumulate a camera to fit the bill. Happily, I was factual.
After my initial research had convinced me to go with a Canon, I borrowed my brother's Rebel (don't know the model number) and my son's Canon PowerShot Pro Series S5 IS. I knew that neither fit my criteria (not to mention the $500-$700 note range was more than I wanted to employ), but using them for a few days gave me the opportunity to check out some of Canon's features.
That's how I discovered the Optical Image Stabilizer. I can ogle from reviews of other cameras that it's been around for a few years, but I'd never frail it before. It immediately went to the top of my list of desired features - even above "easy to expend"!
I have a tremor condition that causes elegant shaking in my hands. It doesn't bother me and doesn't always affect discontinuance work, but it can manufacture holding something valid - say, for instance, a camera - almost impossible. As you can guess, the result of that shakiness when snapping photos is, most often, crappy photos.
Canon's Optical Image Stabilizer was like a miracle for me. With it, I could acquire cessation ups that were startlingly sure - not every time, of course, but MOST times. And, in combination with a rapidly shutter accelerate, the Image Stabilizer helped me to pick up some gargantuan shots - even action shots - of my test subject, my dog.
With my adjusted criteria list, I did some more research that led me to the Canon PowerShot SX120IS 10MP. One of Canon's newer models, the PowerShot SX120IS puts ease of exhaust in the forefront of its advertising. It fit all of my criteria and at a decent notice.
I haven't had this camera for very long, but I'm already thrilled with it. The Easy Mode is actually EASY! What a conception! The LCD mask is larger than what I've outmoded previously and makes it easier for me to think if the narrate I unprejudiced took is relatively obvious. The Image Stabilizer continues to be my recent best friend.
Good points:
IMAGE STABLIZER!!
Fast shutter speed
Genuinely easy to use
Small size
Decent price
Bad points:
I'm so overjoyed with my choice that I can't judge of any moral now!
If I was a serious photographer, I may well have chosen a more comprehensive camera (with all those features and symbols only serious photographers can decipher) . But for my level of exhaust and my personal needs, this one does a terrific job and didn't overly strain the budget. Yeah!
Recommended.
My needs for a camera are as follows:
1) It needs to fit in my pocket
2) It needs to turn on quickly
3) It needs to shoot "decent enough" photos on auto mode
4) It needs to have enough options to tweak lighting settings.
5) It should have both superb indoor and outdoor performance.
6) I'd like something that can do automatic exposure bracketing or otherwise encourage HDR photography.
I've gone through various cameras over the years, and have borrowed some others to mess around with, and until last week was using a Canon A620, which was a surprisingly obliging camera, obedient of taking shots as worthy as a DSLR, especially when tweaked correctly. It also could do automatic exposure bracketing for HDR photography when using the CHDK firmware for it. Then I accidentally left my A620 on a bench on South Beach when visiting last week, and so I suddenly found myself in the market for a unusual camera.
I was seriously looking into the Fuji 200EXR and the Ricoh CX2 for the HDR photography mode, but they didn't have the tweakability settings I liked... the 200EXR was expansive except it always blew out the ISO levels to compensate for its miniature image stabilization capabilities, which made auto mode shots almost always unacceptably grainy. I ended up settling on the SX120IS because it matches all my needs except for HDR photography. That, I'll bear off on until a novel generation or two of HDR cameras has reach and gone.
It has very excellent low-light performance, as long as you're willing to achieve up with a determined amount of graininess Indoors, with the curtains drawn and honest a couple normal lamps lighting the living room, it was able to rob quite decent photos at ISO200. Without a flash. The IS was quite great in this regard, and the only downside was that the image had a noticeable level of noise in it. This will bother some people. Myself - I'm gay that it doesn't do what most P&S cameras do, which is slit the shutter hurry to such a uncouth level that everything blurs into nothingness. This is rather the opposite - quite crisp images with no blur, but you pay for it with a runt bit of noise. I'm magnificent with that, really. I never carry a tripod, instead carrying it around in my pocket whenever I fade, and I like to be able to whip it out and photograph something on the region, indoors or out.
The camera turns on quite speedy, and the auto mode does a generally decent job for taking those speedy shots that would otherwise pass you by (the bird posing on the branch) . The camera also has a the honest amount of manual settings for tweaking your shots objective the plot you want them. (Another poster on here complained it was too complicated for him, and I disclose that could be a magnificent criticism, but for me it's the moral level of complexity.) Like with my other Canon, it allows you to tweak ISO, aperture priority, time priority, or all three, as well as something the A620 couldn't do - a manual focus setting, which has been quite fun to play around with.
As far as all the vaunted features on this camera (auto face recognition, Digic 4, etc.), I didn't really gaze it taking photos noticeably different from my A620. Image quality was about the same with the experimentation I did replicating several shots around the neighborhood. However, since I had no complaints about the A620, this is not a criticism. The one thing I do miss, though, is the flip out viewfinder. I distinguished select a viewfinder that can flip around for self-portraits, or flip backwards to protect itself over the always-out LCD viewfinders which always gather scratched up very quick. But all of them are that design nowadays, so I am not really complaining that distinguished about it.
All in all, a substantial camera.
